Blog

We keep hearing that climate change is an emergency. Governments say it. Scientists say it. Campaigners say it. We even see and feel it in our own experiences. So why do so many ordinary people still feel disconnected from the conversation?

It isn’t because people don’t care. It’s because the conversation often feels distant, confusing, and disconnected from everyday reality.

Part of the problem is trust.

There is no denying that some of the world’s largest businesses have a vested interest in maintaining supply chains built around carbon emissions. Industries that rely on fossil fuels have spent decades influencing public opinion, lobbying governments, and slowing change. That has undoubtedly shaped how the climate debate has unfolded.

But that’s only part of the story.

Science itself is a process, not a final destination. Research constantly evolves. New findings are published every week, old assumptions are challenged, and uncertainties are investigated. That’s exactly how science is supposed to work—but to the public, it can sometimes look like experts are constantly changing their minds. For many people, that creates uncertainty rather than confidence.

Then comes the proposed solution.

We’re often told to embrace renewable energy on a national scale and wait for cleaner electricity, smarter grids, and cheaper technology. That’s a worthwhile goal, but it doesn’t solve today’s problem here and now for me and you.

The fact is that nearly half of households can’t simply install renewables because they are renters and they don’t own their homes or don’t have a suitable roof. Others live in locations where solar generation is poor or wind energy isn’t practical. Many families simply don’t have thousands of pounds available to invest in green technology, even if they want to.

So when people are told that the answer is to “go renewable,” many quietly conclude that the solution isn’t really meant for them even though they care and want to be part of the solution.

That creates disengagement.

If we’re truly facing an emergency, the response can’t rely on options that millions of people simply don’t have access to.

Imagine any other emergency.

If there were a flood, we wouldn’t tell half the population to wait until they owned a boat. If there were a fire, we wouldn’t expect only homeowners not renters to have access to extinguishers.

Emergencies demand practical solutions that everyone can use.

That’s where the climate conversation often loses people. It asks individuals to solve a systemic problem using tools that are unevenly distributed or even accessible.

So what should happen instead?

We urgently need policies and technologies that work regardless of whether someone owns a house, rents a flat, lives in a city, or lives in the countryside. We need affordable ways for everyone to reduce emissions—not just those who can afford the upfront investment.

Most importantly, we need to stop framing climate action as a choice between optimism and defeat.

The options aren’t “cheer for the national grid” or “give up.”

If this really is an emergency, then urgency means finding solutions that are accessible, scalable, and inclusive today for everybody—not at some undefined point in the future.

Perhaps that’s the real reason so many people feel disconnected from the climate conversation.

It’s not because they don’t believe addressing climate change matters.

It’s because too often, they’re presented with solutions that don’t seem to include them.